About Me
I am a neuroscientist, educator, and social activist. I hold an honours B.Sc (with distinction) in Pharmacology, and an M.Sc in Pharmacology with Collaborative Specialization in Biomedical Toxicology, both from the University of Toronto. My PhD project at uOttawa focuses on Parkinson’s disease, specifically on the role of microglia in the processing and propagation of alpha-synuclein, a protein central to the development/progression of the disease
Alfred M. Maluach | PhD Candidate, Neuroscience
Teaching Philosophy
My teaching philosophy is straightforward: keep it simple and incremental.
Every student can learn and master anything, from simple crocheting to basic science, to so-called rocket science. I strongly hold the view that conventional teaching methods stratify students, too quickly (and unfairly) into excellent, good, average, and below average, without a critical appreciation of the context of their teaching and/or learning environments. In my teaching practice, I introduce students to concepts—starting with the most basic and moving along with them to moderately complex and incrementally challenging topics. I teach with enthusiasm and unimpeachable clarity to ensure that no students are left behind. I have found that this approach helps students stay motivated as they reflect critically on the changing complexities of concepts and how they are systematically integrated. Ultimately, this improves students’ retention of learned concepts and their application to unique test situations.
Courses TA’d or Tutored
Digital footprints
Open Course- Under Construction
AM2322- Critical Appraisal of Basic Science Literature
By the end of this course, students will be able to effortlessly read and critically evaluate scientific literature. The course covers the following four thematic issues: 1) A systematic breakdown of the basics of scientific publishing through case studies across journals of varying impact, such as PLOS Biology, Cell, Nature, Science, Lancet, NEJM, Acta Neuropathologica, etc. 2) A review of the anatomy of a scientific paper, i,e how a scientific paper is organized 3) A deep dive into how researchers consolidate concordant and discordant research findings into a ‘story’ and how consumers of such knowledge make sense of this through a healthy dose of appreciation, criticism and/or skepticism in light of study limitations. 4) Getting acquainted with scientific research methods (e.g hypothesis-driven inquiry, technologies) used in research studies